http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/ Luxist Comments for Blended Scotch Whiskies http://www.luxist.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.luxist.com en-us Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/Feb 23rd 2006 1:06AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/Feb 23rd 2006 1:21AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/Feb 23rd 2006 4:09AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/
]]>Feb 23rd 2006 5:10AMhttp://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/http://www.luxist.com/2006/02/22/blended-scotch-whiskies/
Unless you are referring to a snob as someone who buys on price and not taste.

Blue is good. But not $200 good.
The Chivas Royal Salute (shown) is a little cheaper and much better.

But I can show you dozens of single malts which put both of those blends to shame for $140 cheaper.

I also pretty much guarantee that in a blind tasting you couldn't choose between the $200 JW Blue and the $70 JW Gold.

Kevin Erskine
The scotch Blog
www.thescotchblog.com]]>Feb 24th 2006 8:24PM