<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Luxist - Comments for Slate Reviews Celebrity Wines</title>
<link>http://www.luxist.com/2005/02/16/slate-reviews-celebrity-wines/</link>
<description>Luxist Comments for Slate Reviews Celebrity Wines</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Slate Reviews Celebrity Wines]]></title><link>http://www.luxist.com/2005/02/16/slate-reviews-celebrity-wines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.luxist.com/2005/02/16/slate-reviews-celebrity-wines/</guid><description><![CDATA[We have done a rather extensive sampling of celebrity wines at the Boat Basin over the last several years, and we agree with much of what you have to say.  However, we would add that even where a celebrity offering is worth a damn, we would send the same unwavering catagorical imperative: <br><br>Box <br>Your <br>Wine<br>Sir!<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Merlot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2005 6:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>